SECO/WARWICK's Metal Minutes

Feature Article, Vol. 61, Issue 1,   Winter 2003 

Case Study:

TRAVELING BILLET HOMOGENIZING FURNACE

This case study describes equipment installed in a plant located in the Northeastern United States of a major worldwide aluminum billet producer.  For more information on Aluminum heat treatment check out http://www.secowarwick.com/aluminumprocess.html 

The original furnace equipment at this plant were two typical car bottom type homogenizing furnaces. Each furnace had its own powered load car, which the billets were loaded onto and then driven into the furnace. Both furnaces were operating at maximum capacity when increased production requirements forced the plant to add an additional furnace. The two existing furnaces were tucked in a corner of the plant site which made it impossible to add the same type of furnace. So other options were investigated.

Traveling Log Homogenizer

Traveling Log Homogenizer - Click on the photo for our Aluminum Homogenizing Furnace Brochure in .pdf format.

Instead of buying new equipment, a sister plant (which was to be shut down) had an existing Traveling type homogenizing furnace. This type of furnace provided solutions to many of the space problems. Even though it had to be transported and some rebuild work was required, the use of this furnace made good economic sense to the producer.

SECO/WARWICK was contracted to rebuild the furnace. The furnace was disassembled, transported and rebuilt on-site. During the rebuild, the furnace received some modifications in the floor seals and the furnace drives.

The plant was very happy with the decision. In fact, three years later when they required an increase in furnace capacity, the decision was made to purchase a new Traveling furnace, incorporating the design changes learned from the first Traveling furnace experience.

Making the Decision

Limited plant floor space—The utilization of the Traveling furnace provided twice the loading area in half the floor space, since the furnace moves from one loading area laterally to the second loading area.

Loading and unloading consideration-The existing load cars for the car bottom furnaces were elevated off the floor, requiring an overhead crane to load the large diameter billets. This was a very time consuming process to fully load each furnace car. Since the Traveling furnace load base is floor level, each of the two load bases can be loaded or stacked with a fork truck. The loading base was designed with steel cover plates to withstand not only the billet load, but also the weight of the fork truck. Using a fork truck provides a safer alternative for the plant operators because overhead cranes were no longer needed, and the potential of a billet rolling off an above floor level load car was reduced. The loading and unloading of these bases can now be accomplished in half the time. Placing thermocouples in the load is made easier since the load is just above floor level. The previous operation required a lift of some kind to reach the billets when they were stacked on a load car.

Performance improvements-The performance improvements are somewhat difficult to measure when comparing the existing furnace to a new furnace. But there are some major differences to point out:

With the conventional car bottom type of furnaces, the load car has to be removed from the furnace, unloaded and then reloaded, and is then driven back into the furnace. For this time cycle, the furnace has lost a majority of its heat from the previous load, so to bring the furnace back up to temperature will take additional time.

When the new Traveling furnace has completed its cycle, the furnace doors open and the furnace travels from one loading base to the next. The next base is being loaded while the other load is under heat. The result is a faster load change with an already heated furnace. Once the furnace has moved into position on the adjacent load base, the heating cycle begins.

With the Traveling furnace design, the plant sees a 20% reduction in their overall heating time.

CASE STUDY SPECIFICATIONS

Billet Material Specifications: 

  • Batch Load Capacity: 191,505 kg (422,190 lbs) Maximum
  • Billet Diameter: 228.6 mm (9.0 in) Minimum, 473 mm (18.625 in) Maximum
  • Billet Length: 4,420 mm (174 in) Minimum, 5,892 mm (232 in) Maximum

Furnace Specifications

  • Furnace Design Temperature: 649 degC (1,200 degF)
  • Furnace Operating Temperature: 543 degC (1,010 degF)
  • Load Temperature Uniformity:  +/- 8 degC (+/- 15 degF)

Special Features:

  • Movable Internal Baffles
  • Load Base Sealing System
  • Mesh and Mortar Insulation System
  • Special Design Load Bases
  • Intellution™ operator interface software

SUMMARY

Every plant site has its own unique requirements. This customer has been very satisfied with the Traveling furnace design and when the need arises will most likely select the same style of furnace for future expansion.

R1 12/7/2004 Updated source code
R2 12/12/2005 Updated author reference

SECO/WARWICK Corporation

P. O. Box 908, 180 Mercer Street

Meadville, PA  16335-6908  USA

Phone:  814-332-8400 * Fax:  814-724-1407

E-mail:  info@secowarwick.com * Web site:  www.secowarwick.com

©2003-2005 SECO/WARWICK Corporation

 All rights reserved

Contact Beth Ryan, Marketing Services Coordinator for permission to reprint.